Polestar 4 Review: MKBHD Praises Design But Flags Winter Range Problem

Popular tech reviewer Marques Brownlee recently evaluated the Polestar 4, praising its design and technology while questioning its efficiency in colder conditions. Despite the model helping Polestar post strong sales growth in 2025, Brownlee said the vehicle’s real-world winter range made it difficult to recommend at its roughly $62,000 price point.

MKBHD evaluates Polestar 4 design and interior

MKBHD tested the Polestar 4 Long Range Dual Motor, the model’s top configuration with a 102 kWh battery and dual-motor all-wheel drive. The vehicle has a WLTP-rated range of about 590 km (367 miles) and produces up to 544 horsepower, enabling a 0–100 km/h sprint in roughly 3.8 seconds.

In his review, the tech reviewer described the Polestar 4 as an “aesthetic hit,” highlighting its premium interior materials and minimalist design. However, he pointed out one controversial feature: the absence of a traditional rear window. Instead, the vehicle uses a camera-based rear-view system and a solid panel behind the back seats, according to CarUp.

Brownlee said this design choice affected the rear passenger experience. The combination of the low roofline and the blocked rear view made the cabin feel somewhat enclosed compared with other Polestar vehicles.

Despite that criticism, he praised several elements of the driving experience. Brownlee noted that the suspension absorbed large road imperfections well, even without air suspension. He also highlighted the vehicle’s software integration, particularly how Google Maps works with the car’s cameras to guide drivers into the correct lane during navigation.

Winter testing highlights range concerns

The biggest issue in Brownlee’s test centered on efficiency. While the Polestar 4’s battery pack is relatively large, his cold-weather test suggested real-world range could fall significantly below expectations.

According to Brownlee, the vehicle delivered about 200 miles (roughly 320 km) of range in winter conditions. For a vehicle with a roughly 100 kWh battery, he said that result felt underwhelming compared with other EVs that travel significantly farther on smaller battery packs.

Brownlee said that efficiency gap made it difficult to recommend the vehicle at its price point, even though he acknowledged the strengths of its design and interior execution.

He ultimately encouraged Polestar to keep its current design direction while improving efficiency. Brownlee noted that the company’s materials, styling, and technology integration are already competitive, but said improving range would make the Polestar 4 a much stronger overall package.

EV.com tracks the evolving EV collector space and performance electric vehicles hitting the market. Explore our listings to find the best EVs in your area available today.